The Advocate
January 2006
The Dark Side Of Community:
What Do We Do When People We Serve
Break The Law?
Wednesday
evening Roger walked out in front of a car in the middle of a block and was
thrown up over the hood, top of the car, and trunk. He miraculously somersaulted over the car and
landed on his feet before he landed face up on the pavement.
At the
hospital emergency room, Roger was found to have a few cuts, bruises, and he
complained of soreness in his wrists, shoulder, hips, and ankles. “The good news,” reported his ISC the next
day, “no broken bones or concussion.” However, his wallet contained something
quite extraordinary.
Amidst the joy of bringing
Roger home with no serious injuries the hospital staff handed the provider
staff and ISC the contents of Roger’s wallet.
Thirty-eight $100 bills.
Almost in unison those present
said, “Where did that kind of money come from?”
Everyone was surprised because
Roger was unemployed from his supported employment job as a part-time janitor
of a fast food restaurant for the past three months and his support team was
trying to help him find another job. He had turned down two offers because he
didn’t like the work. In addition, it was very unusual for Roger to have more
than $5 in his wallet because of the way his conservator arranged the
distribution of cash.
His social security money is
automatically deposited into his checking account and at the insistence of his
conservator he receives assistance in money management. He has a history of hoarding his money and
street robbers have stolen money from him twice over the past ten years.
During the next several days, a
story emerged that resulted in a support team meeting to decide what should be
done that would be in Roger’s best interest, the support team’s interest, and
the two agencies responsible for providing Roger with living and vocational
supports.
Roger is a forty-year old
person with mental retardation. He is
served by a provider agency and an independent support coordination agency in
an attempt to provide him with supports that will allow him to live and work in
the community. He is a person who is able to take care of many of his own
needs; however, he needs assistance with paying bills, some self maintenance
reminders, reminders to take important medications, and from time-to-time he
needs assistance in interacting appropriately with others. He occasionally buys alcohol and drinks to
excess; however, he does not, as he says, “do drugs.” His conservator has a
long relationship with Roger and has helped him through the passage of leaving
an institution for life in the community, his medical needs, and his need for
guidance, especially with matters related to drinking alcohol and money
management.
During the investigation staff
found that Roger had an unofficial part-time job “running” money and drugs
between customers and a seller at a local drive-in. He is paid between $5 and $25 for each
delivery he makes. He is paid in cash
every night and he goes to the bank to have his small bills converted into $100
dollar bills or larger from time to time.
Support team members including
Roger’s conservator were dumbfounded to learn about his “job,” and members
could not agree on how to proceed with the best way to help Roger. All agreed that Roger was involved in an
illegal activity that needed to stop.
Some support team members felt
the drug running should be reported to the police. Others, including the conservator had strong opinions
that it was not the responsibility of the support team to report the illegal
activity. They wanted closer
supervision, more intense support in getting Roger a job and increased
relationships that would divert Roger from associating with anyone in the drug
community. The support coordinator said,
“Well, although we are divided, we know what we want for Roger, I wonder what
Roger wants to do with his life given the events of the past several days?”
If you were a member of Roger’s
support team, what recommendations would you make that would be in the best
interest of all concerned? What needs to happen?
Here are a few
responses from The Arc Board and staff members:
“Where was
Roger’s supervision in the evenings when he was smuggling drugs? There are many examples of individuals with
disabilities being taken advantage of, and this is one of those instances. As his ISC, I would explain to him that his
actions were illegal, and he would have to return the money to the police. I would then contact the police and explain
the situation. Hopefully the police
would appreciate someone coming forward to stop the drug smuggling from
continuing.”
“Client
confidentiality should be a major consideration before reporting to the police
Roger’s involvement. Roger could be
removed from the situation before law enforcement looked into the problem. The next step could be an intervention with
Roger and his support team, explaining to Roger where he erred and the
consequences that follow from poor decision-making. His support team needs to explore why Roger is
attracted to the people at the drive-in in the first place. A positive approach would be to introduce him
to people that provide a more positive influence. Roger’s employment team needs to identify the
ideal job for him based on his likes and dislikes. The goal should be transferring Roger’s
desires to be at the drive-in to a desire to be a productive member of
society. When Roger feels comfortable in
the workforce, accepted as a coworker, and included in all aspects of the
workplace culture, he will be happier and develop a greater sense of
self-worth.”
“It is often a
difficult task to ascertain supervision and how many supports to provide to
individuals that are served by provider agencies and independent support
coordination. At what point does our
assistance become interference, and how well are we listening when an
individual shares with us what they want in life? In Roger’s situation, it appears that he lost
a job he enjoyed and has begun supplementing his income with a “part-time”
job. Maybe Roger feels that his need for
employment isn’t being taken seriously.
He’s already been offered two jobs that he wasn’t interested in. If his interests were examined, his support
team could assist him in applying for a job he really wanted. His team needs to explain that running drugs
is not an acceptable option. A strategy needs to be put in place to assist
Roger in managing his own funds. The
persons responsible for paying Roger to run drugs need to be turned in to the
police. Hopefully the police would agree
that Roger has been exploited and not prosecute him.”
Family Support:
Keeping Families Together
The Arc of
Washington County began its Family Support Program in 1992. The program is offered to assist persons with
disabilities and their families in their efforts to remain together in their
homes and communities. Family Support is
often described as “whatever it takes.”
The Arc’s Family Support
Program serves seven counties in East Tennessee. Our service areas include Washington, Carter,
Hawkins, Johnson, Unicoi, Sullivan and Hancock counties. The program is funded under an agreement with
the state of Tennessee, Department of Finance and Administration and the
Division of Mental Retardation Services.
Families are the greatest
resource available to each other. The
values of the program are deeply rooted in family involvement and empowerment
to provide what the person or family needs in order to function in their home
and community. Its goals are centered
around keeping the family together by providing assistance so the person with a
disability may live at home or in an independent setting. Family Support works to improve the
caregiving ability of families and helps them find and use available supports.
The Family Support Program
consists of three active councils. The
majority of the council’s members are individuals with disabilities or family
members of individuals with disabilities.
The three councils represent the program at the state, district and
local levels. The State Council
participates with the Division of Mental Retardation Services in the
development of program policies and procedures and the implementation of the
Family Support Program. The District and
Local Councils advise Family Support agencies, provide oversight and make
recommendations to the state council in funding needs and priorities for
services.
Family Support can provide
respite care, personal assistance, homemaker services, child care, minor home
repairs, specialized equipment, clothing, supplies, nutritional needs, vehicle
modifications, nursing services and any other assistance the family needs to
remain together and/or maintain independence.
Once needs are determined and approval has been granted from a local
council, an individualized plan will be developed for the person or family
receiving support. Currently
approximately 150 individuals are approved to receive Family Support
services. Unfortunately, there are
approximately 200 more people on waiting lists to receive services in our
service area.
The Family Support Program is
one of the most “family friendly” and cost effective programs for which a
majority of families are very thankful.
For more information, please contact us at (423) 928-9362, extension 215.
Monitoring Process Proves Helpful To
Early Intervention Program
The Continuous
Improvement Monitoring Process (CIMP) is the name the Tennessee Department of
Education gives to a self-evaluation process that helps agencies meet Part C regulations
of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
In April 2005, Little Folks
Early Intervention Specialists and our Arc’s Executive Director presented the
results of a self-assessment and a Program Improvement Plan (PIP) to a committee
of community participants that included a parent, board member, member of the
Tennessee Early Intervention System, and the Executive Director of an agency
providing community supports to families and children. In August 2005, the PIP
was approved by the Department of Education.
Our early
intervention program achieved compliance with 23 of the required 30
indicators. Seven indicators were
partially met. Scores for the self-assessment varied from a low of 0% for
Transition outcomes to a high of 100% for Public Awareness, Family-Centered
Services, Personnel, and General Supervision.
The next step in the continuous
monitoring process is to prepare an Annual Performance Report (APR). This report will include information on
progress or slippage from the seven partially met indicators in the PIP. By March 1, 2006, staff will prepare and
submit reports of future activities and/or strategies to achieve and maintain
projected targets. Staff will identify
timelines and resources for meeting targets.
One important area noted for
improvement within this fiscal year was the need to assist families with
transition from early intervention supports and services into the wider world
of preschool and/or community experiences. A transition plan is developed in
collaboration with the family, to enable the child and family to move smoothly
from one system to another. More intensity has been given to helping each
family explore transition options.
In efforts to improve
transition planning, a team was created consisting of staff from Little Folks,
Tennessee’s Early Intervention System (TEIS), Teaching Hands, and Tennessee
Infant Parent Service (TIPS). The goal of this team is to create a transition
packet that can be shared with families during the planning process. The packet
is near completion and will be a valuable resource for families.
New Faces In The Arc’s
Greeneville Office
David Carico is
our most recent addition and comes to us with 10 years of experience in working
with individuals with disabilities. He is
a graduate of East Tennessee State University with a degree in Criminal
Justice. David is married with a 14
month old daughter named Chloe. “David
is a great person with a wonderful heart who has a tremendous work ethic,” said
Elizabeth Cox, ISC Manager.
Erica Beach
graduated from East Tennessee State University in 2000 with a Bachelor of
Science degree. Said Elizabeth, “From
day one, Erica picked right up and has had no problems learning her new job as
an independent support coordinator.” Her
previous work experience includes working with children with physical,
emotional, and/or developmental disabilities.
Away from the Arc, Erica is married with three children.
Melandie Akins
is a University of Tennessee graduate with a Bachelors of Science and Social
Work “She has done well, is dependable
and is developing a good knowledge of the people she serves,” said
Elizabeth.
She fits in well with everyone
at the Arc, and takes the initiative to get things done. Melandie was recently married.
The Advocate Special Insert
January 2006
Church Hill, Tennessee:
A Community Of Caring Citizens
In a world of “what have you done for me lately”
it is refreshing to realize there are individuals and groups living within our community
whose hearts, minds, and efforts collaborate in loving kindness and compassion.
There are people in our community who go the extra mile to help those in
need. Yes, at times, it may be somewhat
inconvenient, it may be added work to an already overloaded schedule, but the
reward that comes from putting someone else’s need above your own is
immeasurable.
A town is not always a community. People may live near each other, wave to each
other and become hi-bye neighbors. They
pay taxes, shop in the same stores, pass each other on the way to and from
work, worship at the same church and still not be a community. People often say
they live in a community but when they look in the mirror they see they have
become isolated and fragmented. Other
than a wave here and there and sharing space in church, school, or clubs they
spend the majority of their time alone in a house that may or may not be a
home. They become a pretend community.
People become a community when they put the
values of respect, service, support and
love of others into action. They are a community when they extend a helping
hand, heart, and/or prayers to all who need it.
Together, people form a community when their
thoughts, words, and actions demonstrate that caring for others is more than
words. Some would say it is the reason
for our birth.
The community of Church Hill, Tennessee saw the
need of a fellow community member and answered the call. They demonstrated to all of us what it means
to be a community.
Frank Davis, an individual with disabilities
served by the Arc of Washington County’s independent support coordination
program was in need of major assistance to improve the deteriorating condition
of his house and the property on which it is situated.
He lives in Church Hill with his 86 year old
mother who takes care of him. He has
spent 45 of his 56 years in this house that is home to him and his mother. This is the home where many in the community
have watched him grow into the man he is today.
This is the home that welcomed Frank for 35 years after each day’s work at the Church Hill Elementary
School cafeteria. He loves this home, and the community of Church Hill loves
him.
Enter First Methodist Church of Church Hill. Frank has been a member of First Methodist
his entire life. The many members of the
church know Frank and his family and many have volunteered alongside Frank
through church activities.
Several groups within the church got together and
decided they would like to help Frank and his mother fix up their house that
was in need of so many repairs. “The
church saw it as an outreach mission to assist Frank and his mother, Louise, in
getting their home repaired,” said First Methodist Pastor, Ron Ramsey.
“Frank has been such a blessing to our
congregation. I think we felt like we
were returning a blessing for all the things Frank has done for us over the
years.”
“Frank has assisted in the Sunday School
department by keeping the class roles for years. E.B. Bridges and Becky Ferrell
have been instrumental in coordinating the effort on behalf of the
church.”
Together, with the help of Susie Cline, Frank’s
independent support coordinator, the congregation put together a team of
community members who were also interested in helping.
Jimmy’s Lawn Service has already redone the
landscaping around the home to include mowing, trimming and cutting down
trees. First Baptist Church of Church
Hill has replaced the underpinning of the house. The men of First Methodist are undertaking
painting, redoing electrical work, and repairing the roof. The women of the church have gone in and
cleaned the inside of the house from top to bottom.
Frank’s independent support coordinator worked
with area companies to donate money for much needed supplies. Community Clothes Closet, Church Hill
Ruritan, Families First, and a fellow church member all answered the call and
donated funds for the effort. “Everyone
has been so willing to pitch in and help Frank and his family. The support we have received from these
people and organizations has been amazing,” said Susie Cline, Frank’s independent support coordinator.
In addition, Frank was recently
hospitalized. “In order to be released
following his illness, he needed assistance at home beyond what his mother
could manage,” explained Linda Tilson, family support coordinator. Enter the Family Support Program of The Arc
of Washington County. They provided
respite services for Frank, so that he was able to return to the comfort of his
own home.
Love, a sense of belonging and support from
others are things we all hope to possess.
Frank and his family have been shown what can happen when people don’t
look the other way; when they don’t assume someone else will take care of
it. They have been shown kindness,
unselfishness and love from a very caring community.
As with any project, the home renovations did not
happen overnight. It took time and a
lot of effort from many different groups, who were all willing to come to the
aid of a fellow citizen. Some by
donating funds; some by donating their time and effort; some who did both; all who donated a small portion of themselves
to improve the quality of life for another.
Isn’t that what community is all about?
We celebrate and honor the people of Church Hill.
We are thankful they allow us to be part of the
love they share for helping others in need.
They are fulfilling the vision of community expressed by the first governor of Massachusetts Bay Colony,
John Winthrop who wrote in 1630, “We must delight in each other, make others’
condition our own, rejoice together, mourn together, labor and suffer together,
always having before our eyes our community as members of the same body.”
In this article the words “house” and “home” have
been used to describe where Frank and his mother live. Many people live in houses that are not
homes. They, unlike, Frank do not have
mothers who love them. Some houses are
filled with anger, despair, abuse, neglect, and worse. These are not
homes.
Frank’s friends and helpers have come to
appreciate that Frank lives in a house that is also a home. He lives with a
mother who loves him and he returns that love.
Because of the love Church Hill has shown for Frank and his mother and
the love they show for those in the community who have so lovingly supported
and helped them it can be said that Church Hill is a home.
Living together, helping, and loving each other
is what creates home. Bill Schiers,
executive director, shares one of his stories about the difference between house
and home:
“A family was once forced to live in a hotel
during the depression. A little girl was riding the elevator from the rooms
down to the main floor when a man said, ’You’re that little girl from the
family that doesn’t have a home.’ The little girl said, ’We have a home, we
just don’t have a place to put it.’”